Red Blood Cell Transfusion (Converted)

Published 2011

Recommendations Regarding Alternatives to RBC Transfusion

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

  1. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) administration improves reticulocytosis and hematocrit and may decrease overall transfusion requirements.
  2. Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) are undergoing investigation for use in critically ill and injured patients but are not yet approved for use in the United States.

Level 3

Recommendations Regarding Indications for RBC Transfusion in the General Critically Ill Patient

Level 1

  1. RBC transfusion is indicated for patients with evidence of hemorrhagic shock. (Level 1)
  2. RBC transfusion may be indicated for patients with evidence of acute hemorrhage and hemodynamic instability or inadequate oxygen delivery. (Level 1)
  3. A “restrictive” strategy of RBC transfusion (transfuse when Hb < 7 g/dL) is as effective as a “liberal” transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb < 10 g/dL) in critically ill patients with hemodynamically stable anemia, except possibly in patients with acute myocardial ischemia. (Level 1)

Level 2

  1. The use of only Hb level as a “trigger” for transfusion should be avoided. Decision for RBC transfusion should be based on an individual patient’s intravascular volume status, evidence of shock, duration and extent of anemia, and cardiopulmonary physiologic parameters. (Level 2)
  2. In the absence of acute hemorrhage RBC, transfusion should be given as single units. (Level 2)
  3. Consider transfusion if Hb < 7 g/dL in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). There is no benefit of a “liberal” transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb < 10 g/dL) in critically ill patients requiring MV. (Level 2)
  4. Consider transfusion if Hb < 7 g/dL in resuscitated critically ill trauma patients. There is no benefit of a “liberal” transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb < 10 g/dL) in resuscitated critically ill trauma patients. (Level 2)
  5. Consider transfusion if Hb < 7 g/dL in critically ill patients with stable cardiac disease. There is no benefit of a “liberal” transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb < 10 g/dL) in critically ill patients with stable cardiac disease. (Level 2)
  6. RBC transfusion should not be considered as an absolute method to improve tissue oxygen consumption in critically ill patients. (Level 2)

Level 3

RBC transfusion may be beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are anemic (Hb < 8 g/dL) on hospital admission. (Level 3)

Recommendations Regarding RBC Transfusion in Patients at Risk for or With Acute Lung Injury (ALI) and ARDS

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

  1. All efforts should be initiated to avoid RBC transfusion in patients at risk for ALI and ARDS after completion of resuscitation.
  2. All efforts should be made to diagnose and report transfusion-related ALI (TRALI) to the local blood bank because it has emerged as a leading cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality, despite underdiagnosis and underreporting.
  3. RBC transfusion should not be considered as a method to facilitate weaning from MV.

Level 3

Recommendations Regarding RBC Transfusion in Patients With Neurologic Injury and Diseases

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 Recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

There is no benefit of a “liberal” transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb < 10 g/dL) in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

Level 3

Decisions regarding blood transfusion in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) must be assessed individually since optimal transfusion triggers are not known and there is no clear evidence that blood transfusion is associated with improved outcome.

Recommendations Regarding RBC Transfusion in Sepsis

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

The transfusion needs for each septic patient must be assessed individually since optimal transfusion triggers in sepsis patients are not known and there is no clear evidence that blood transfusion increases tissue oxygenation.

Level 3

Recommendations Regarding RBC Transfusion Risks

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 Recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

  1. RBC transfusion is associated with increased nosocomial infection (wound infection, pneumonia, sepsis) rates independent of other factors.
  2. RBC transfusion is an independent risk factor for MOF and SIRS.
  3. There is no definitive evidence that prestorage leukocyte depletion of RBC transfusion reduces complication rates, but some studies have shown a reduction in infectious complications.
  4. RBC transfusions are independently associated with longer ICU and hospital length of stay, increased complications, and increased mortality.
  5. There is a relationship between transfusion and ALI and ARDS.

Level 3

Recommendations Regarding Strategies to Reduce RBC Transfusion

Level 1

There are insufficient data to support Level 1 recommendations on this topic.

Level 2

  1. The use of low-volume adult or pediatric blood sampling tubes is associated with a reduction in phlebotomy volumes and a reduction in blood transfusion.
  2. The use of blood conservation devices for reinfusion of waste blood with diagnostic sampling is associated with a reduction in phlebotomy volume.
  3. Intraoperative and postoperative blood salvage and alternative methods for decreasing transfusion may lead to a significant reduction in allogeneic blood usage.
  4. Reduction in diagnostic laboratory testing is associated with a reduction in phlebotomy volumes and a reduction in blood transfusion.

Level 3